Blog Archive

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

~Drug & Alcohol~ rehab programs






Not able to see this news-letter as pictures are blank? Make sure to press here to re-load.

~Drug & Alcohol~ rehab programs







aristocracy. The factors in this change were: first, geographical conditions, lack of good harbors, and a wide stretch of hinterland cultivated by peaceful peasants; and secondly, very probably, the acquired organization into clhies taken with them from their originial homes. in many cases, they were fugitive nobles,the vanquished of domestic feuds, or younger sons, sometimes an entire generation of youth of bothhies, who thus started "on the viking," and having at home had lands and serfs, as petty lords, they again sought in foreign lands what they regarded as their due. The occupation of England by the Anglo-Saxons, [143]and of SouthernItaly by the Normans, are examples of this method; so tooare the Spanish and Portuguese colonizations of Mexico and of South America. The Achæan colonies of Greater Greece in Southern Italy furnish additional and very important instances of this development of territorial feudal states by sea nomads: "This Achæan League of cities was a true colonization. The cities were without harbors—Croton only had a fair roadstead—and were without anytrade of their own; the Sybaritecould boast of his growing gray in his water town between his home bridges, while buying and selling were carried on by Milesians and Etruscans. On the other hand, the Greeks in this region not only controlled the fringe of the shore, but ruled from sea to sea; . . . the native agricultural inhabitants were forced into a relation of clientage orserfdom, and were required to work the farms of their masters or to hi tribute to them."80 it is probable that most of thedoric


colonies in Crete were similarly organized. [144] But in the course of universal history these "territorial states," whether they arose more or less frequently, did not acquire any such importance as did those maritime cities which devoted their principal energies to commerce and to privateering. Mommsen contrasts in distinct and well chosen sentences the Achæan landed squire with the "royal merchants" of the Greek Colonies in Southern Italy: "In no way did they spurn agriculture or the increase of territory; the Greeks were not satisfied, at least not after they became powerful, to remain within the confined space of a fortified commercial factory in the midst of the country of the barbarians, as the Phænicians had done. Their cities were founded primarily and exclusively for purposes of trade, and unlike the Achæan colonies, were universally situated at the best harbors and landing places."81 We arecertain, in the case of the ionic colonies, andmay well hiume it for the other cases,



that the founders of these cities were not landed squires, but seafaring merchants. But such maritime states or cities, in the [145]strict sense, came into being not only through warlike conquest, but also through peaceable beginnings, by a more or less mixed pénétration pacifique.


Where, however, the Vikings did not meet peaceable peasants, but feudal states in the primitive stage, willing to fight, they offered and accepted



terms of peace and settled down as colonies of merchants. We know of such cases from every part of the world, in harbors and on markets held on shore. To take the instances with which Germans are most conversant, there are the settlements of North German merchants in countries along the German ocean and the Baltic Sea, the German Steel Yard in London, the Hansa in Sweden and Norway, on the Island of Schönen, and in Russia, at Novgorod. In Wilna, the capital of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania, there was such a colony; and the Fondaco dei Tedeschi in Venice is another .







No comments: