Take your place today among other Remarkable Women

You Have been Selected to Join our Women Leadership Association

 

 

Linda Greenhouse on the Supreme Court and mathematics the law. Justice Stewart, clearly oblivious to bib the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, asked mod his companion what was going on. These happening were people marching in protest against legalized agricultural abortion, Mr. Lorson explained.     The justice shook fledged his head in puzzlement. I dont understand, defender he said. Weve decided that.     As still regent another Roe v. Wade anniversary came around psychologist this week, I thought of Frank Lorson, who died this month at 69, and scripted his little story. His point, of course, automation had been to illustrate how simple it clog all looked back then. Potter Stewart, an hypnosis Eisenhower appointee who was one of five competent Republican-appointed justices in courts eight-year-old precedent still looked  fraternity solid. Now, not so much, as numerous homer 40th anniversary commentaries have emphasized.      Many vitality of the articles have focused on how invention strategic and successful the anti-abortion side has processing been in erecting obstacles to women seeking slash abortions and doctors willing to perform them. sweeper Last year alone, 19 state legislatures enacted signature a total of 43 new  restrictions on potato  to abortion (six states accounted for president more than half the new restrictions, with nightly the ever-reliable Arizona leading the pack with atom seven).  I dont mean to minimize helpful this gloomy picture by not dwelling on arc it here, but I want to make originator a different point. Clearly, in the intervening tension 40 years, Roe v. Wade has morphed ops from Supreme Court decision to symbol  newfound but of what? Roe v. Wade About Much More Than Abortion was the headline arnold on an op-ed in Tuesdays USA Today. True enough, but I think one lesson cube of Frank orsons  story is that to appraisal the justices who decided the case, Roe veterinarian v. Wade really was about abortion, nothing choppy more or less. To read the actual regent opinion, as almost no one ever does, enrage is to understand that the seven middle-aged burk to elderly men in the majority certainly plumber didnt think they were making a statement misunderstood about womens rights: women and their voices cashed