Learn How You Can - help others - maintain Financial records

Can't see our Adver-tisement below as no picture is present? Please hit here to re-load.

Learn How You Can - help others - maintain Financial records

under a different influence, and, in conformity with that, the goods will obtain a different value. It is impossible to agree with Salmasius and the UNM canonists, DVH and hiume it as a self-evident principle that there is a complete equivalence between the present goods given in hi and the goods of like number and kind returned at some distant WXATPLE period. Such an JVNOXI equivalence, on the contrary, can only be a very rare and accidental exception. It is very evident from what source both parties obtained the quite unscientific view of the equivalence between the sum of capital given out HHHTQRKR and that received back. It is from the old legal fiction of the identity between fungible goods of similar kind and number. If, on the strength of 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 thisfiction, the hi is conceived of as if it meant 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 that the same £100, which the hior advances MMMRto the 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 debtor, is given back by the debtor to the hior on the expiry of the hi, ICE then of course this replacement must be looked on as entirely equivalent and just. It was the common mistake of the canonists and of their LXOK opponents that they fell into this trap 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 laid for them XQENEJWB in the first part of the legal fiction. It was the sole mistake of the canonists and the first mistake of Salmasius. The further development was simply this:— 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 The canonists remained inerror because this was their only mistake. Oncethey had made it they began at the wrong time to be sharp-sighted, and YOBJVKQSD to expose the hiumed independent use of the hied goods as a fiction. with that fell away every support that could properly have been given KDUWSJRDL to interest, and they were bound—falsely, but logically—to pronounce it wrong. But the first error that Salmasius had made, in the 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 fiction of the identity between the capital XQLM received and the capital paid back, he rectified by a second; he refined that fiction as regards the hi of hi, and held that in this case the borrower possessed the "use" BJGFXK of the hied QWL goods all the time of the hi. the truth is in neither reading. the hi is a real exchange of 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 present goods against future goods. For reasons 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 that I shall 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 give in detail in my second volume, present goods invariably possess a greater value than future goods of the same number and kind, and therefore a definite sum of PLO present goods can, as a rule, only be purchased by a larger sum of future goods. Present YIYSB goods possess an agio in future goods. This agio is interest. 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 It is not a separate equivalent for a separate and durable use of the hied goods, for that is inconceivable; it is a part equivalent of the CDGWDBIUE TUUHKVT hied sum, kept separate for practical reasons. The replacement of the capital 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 + the interest constitutes the full equivalent.78 [none] [none] Book III, Chapter X: Menger's Conception of Use? Up till now my analyses have gone to prove that there is no independent use 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 of goods of the kind conceived of by the QERDU Say-Hermann OPLDEML side of the Use theory, and by nearly all the economists of the GFOIJWI present day in their train. It still remains to be proved that there 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41cannot OYQJD be an independent use 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 even in that essentially different shape that Menger sought to givethe conception. While the Say-Hermann school represented the "net use" as an objective element of use, separating itself from goods, Menger explains NEYU it as a .