Blog Archive

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Join the 2.2 Million others... & Counting That Save 1000's a Year With The white house Refi Program.







Can't look at this A-d because of pictures being off? simply visit right here to fix.

Join the 2.2 Million others... & Counting That Save 1000's a Year With The white house Refi Program.







knowledge becomes not only a mere aggregate 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 but a system, connected according 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 to BWTJQOEFN necessary laws. We ought not to say that such an idea is a concept of an object, but only of the complete unity of concepts, so 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 far as that unity can serve as a rule of the UVHHKIJ understanding. Such concepts of reason are 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 not derived from nature, but we only interrogate nature, according to these ideas, and consider our knowledge as defective so long as it is not adequate to them. We must confess that [646] pure earth, pure water, pure air, etc., are hardly to be met with. Nevertheless we require 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 the concepts ODJ of them (which, LDCSJT so far as their perfect purity is concerned, have their origin in 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 reason only) in order to YMNQURS be able to 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 determine properly the share which belongs to every one of these natural causes in RNEKE phenomena. Thus every kind of matter is referred to earths (as 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 mere weight), to salts and inflammable bodies (as force), and lastly, to water 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 and air as vehicles (or, as it were, machines, by 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 which the former exercise JPSGNCO their operations), in order thus, according to the idea of 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 a mechanism, to explain the mutual chemical workings of matter. For, although not openly acknowledged XLAOOJD in these


terms, such an influence of reason onthe clhiifications of natural philosophers can easily 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 be 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41discovered. [520] If reason is the faculty of deducing the particular from the general, the general is either certain in itself and given, or not. In the former case nothing is required but judgment in subsuming, the particular being thus TOXFK necessarily determined by the general. This I shall call the apodictic use of reason. In the latter case, when WRA the general is admitted as problematical only, and as a mere idea, while the particular is certain, but QMR the universality of the rule applying to it JGGPQM is still a 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 problem, several particular cases, which are all certain, are tested by the rule, whether they submit to it; and in this 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 case, when it appears YIFI that all VKYTX YJOKOIB particular cases which can be produced 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 are subjected to it, the rule is concluded to be MNMJHMATH [647] universal, and from that universality of 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 the rule conclusions are drawn afterwards with regard to all 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 cases, even those that LCPESCF 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 are not given by themselves. This I shall call the hypothetical use of reason.


The 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 hypothetical use of reason, resting on ideas as problematical concepts, ought not to be used constitutively, as if we could prove by it, judging strictly, the truth of the universal rule, which has been admitted as an hypothesis. For how are we to BKNWUMSS know all possible cases, which, as subject to the same principle, should prove its universality? The proper hypothetical use of 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 reason is regulative only, and intended to introduce, as much as


possible, unity into the 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 particulars of knowledge, and thus to approximate the rule to universality. The hypothetical use of reason aims therefore at the systematical unity of the knowledge of the understanding, and NEJY that unity is thetouchstone of the truth of the rules. On the other hand, 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 that systematical unity (asa mere idea) is only 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 a projected unity, to be considered, not as given in [521] itself, but as a problem only, though helping us to discover a principle .







No comments: