Blog Archive

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

~ Earn the degree ~ That you need--to succeed | Access, your degree info, now







Cant read our Adver-tisement below as no picture is present? Go ahead and hit right here to fix.

~ Earn the degree ~ That you need--to succeed | Access, your degree info, now





manifestly tending towards a state of full economic autarky of each nation. In such a world, what fate is in store for those nations who can neither


hid nor clothe their citizens out of domestic resources? [361] The Lebensraum doctrine of the self-styled "have-not" peoples emphasizes that there are in America and in Australia millions of acres of unused land much more fertile than the barren soil which the farmers of the have-not nations are tilling. Natural conditions for mining and manufacturing are likewise much more propitious than in the countries of the have-nots. But the German, Italian and Japanese peasants and workers are barred from access to these areas favoured by nature. The immigration laws of the comparatively underpopulated countries prevent their migration.These laws raise the marginal productivity of labour and thereby wage ratesin the underpopulated countries and lower them in the overpopulated countries. The high standard of living in the United States and the British Dominions is



paid for by a lowering of the standard of living in the congested countries of Europe and Asia. The true aggressors, say these German, Italian and Japanese nationalists, are those nations who by means of trade and migration barriers have arrogated to themselves the lion's share of the natural riches of the earth. Has not the Pope68 himself declared that the root causes of the World Wars are "that cold and calculating egoism which tends to hoard the economic resources and materials destined forthe use of all to such an extent that the nationsless favoured by nature are not permitted access to them"?69 The war that Hitler, Mussolini and Hirohito kindled was from this point of view a just war, for its only aim was to give to the have-nots


what, by virtue of natural and divine right, belongs to them. The Russians cannot venture to justify their aggressive policy by such arguments. Russia is a comparatively underpopulated country. Its soil is much better endowed by nature than that of any other nation. It offers the most advantageous conditions for the growing of all kinds of cereals, fruits, seeds and plants. Russia owns immense pastures and almost inexhaustible forests. It has the richest resources for the production of gold, silver, platinum, iron, copper, nickel, manganese and all other metals, and of oil. But for the despotism of the Czars and the lamentable inadequacy of the communist system, its population could long since have



enjoyed the highest standard of living. It is certainly not lack of natural resources that pushes Russia towards conquest. Lenin's aggressiveness was an outgrowth of his conviction that he was the leader of the final world revolution. He considered himself as the legitimate successor of the First International, destined to accomplish the task in which Marx and Engels had failed. The knell of capitalism had sounded, and no capitalist machinations could delay the expropriation of the expropriators any longer. What was needed was only the dictator of the new social order. Lenin was ready to take the burden upon his shoulders.



Since the days of the Mongol invasions mankind has not had to face such an unflinching and thorough-going aspiration for unlimited world supremacy.In every country the Russian emissaries and the communist fifth columns were fanatically working for the "Anschluss" to Russia. But Lenin lacked the first four columns. Russia's military forces were at that time contemptible. When they crossed the Russian borders, they were stopped by .







No comments: