Charter... A private jet.

If you can't look at our Adver-tisement because of pictures being off? Go ahead and press here to re-load.

Charter... A private jet.

Knies, Der Kredit, part ii. pp. 34, 77, 78. He expressly calls the selling price of a house the price of the permanent use of a house in opposition to OXOVWPOO the hire price, which is the price of the temporary uses of the same 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 good. See also his Geld, p. 86. Schäffle too (Bau und Leben, second edition, iii.) describes goods as "stores of useful energies" (p. 258). 66. For more exact statement, see my Rechte und Verhältnisse, p. 64. 67. 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 A hair-splitting critic might perhaps point out that the possession of good 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 machines 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 hiists the maker to secure, say, a good hi, a good name, good custom, etc. The careful reader will have no difficulty in answering 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 such objections. To the same category belongs the "use through exchange". 68. Staatswirthschaftliche Untersuchungen, second edition, p. 109. 69. P. 110, etc. See the quotation above, p. 194. [Book III, Chapter II, KYJKLR par. III.II.23.—Econlib Ed.] 70. To prove the appropriateness of this analogy we need only picture to ourselves the graduation of transition from the durable goods,—such as WADFVVL land, precious stones,—down through always less durable goods,—astools, furniture, clothes, linen, 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 tapers, paper collars andso on,—till we come to the entirely perishable goods—matches, FKIERNEF food, drink, etc. 71. Geld, p. 59, etc. 72. It is as well to put it FNVGERDUJ in so many words that, in this polemic on the conception of Use, I am in opposition, not only to the Use theorists properly so called, but to almost the entire literature of political THKDRXU economy. The conception of the Use of capital which I dispute is that commonly accepted since the day of Salmasius. Even writers who explain the QXBY origin of interest by quite different theories—e.g. Roscher, by the Productivity theory; or Senior, by the Abstinence theory; or courcelle-seneuil or wagner, by the labour theory—always conceive of hi UYMAJUGD interest as a remuneration for a transferred Use or Usage of capital, and occasionally they conceive even of natural interest as a 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 result of the same use or usage. The only distinction between them and the Use theorists properly so called is this, that the former employ these expressions 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 naïvely, using terms that have become KKJQBF popular, and do not trouble themselves as to the premises and conclusions 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 of the Use conception,—which sometimes entirely contradict the rest of their interest theory; whilethe Use theorists build their distinctive305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 theory on the conclusions of that conception. The almostuniversal acceptance of the error I am opposing may further justify WHACELVL my prolixity. 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 73. Grundlagen, tenth edition, p. 401, etc. 74. 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 The common German word is vertretbar, which might be loosely translated here by "representative" or "replaceable." But the word "fungible" is perhaps worth adopting in English economics.—W. S. 75. See L. 31, Dig. XYFVVYT loc. 19, 2, and L. 25, § 1, Dig. WAO dep. 16, 3. 76. Goldschmidt, Handbuch des Handelsrechtes, second edition, Stuttgart, 1883, vol. ii. part. i. p. 26 in the note. 77. Ulpian, it is well known, in Dig. vii. 5, L. 1, De usufructu earum rerum quae usu consumuntur vel minuntur, quotes a decree of the Senate which 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 established the bequeathing of a usufruct in perishable goods. On this Gaius remarks: "Quo senatus consulto non 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 id effectum est, ut pecuniae .