Take The first step... to Sobriety

If you can't explore our Adver-tisement at all? simply browse this to reload'em.

Take The first step... to Sobriety

might have had. In the majority of economical sacrifices which we make to gain a definite useful end, AVTKTG the only question is about one of these kinds of loss, and 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 here the calculation of the sacrifice undergone is very simple. if i 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 VBNHNNSFA lay out a sum of hi, say £30, for any one useful end, my sacrifice is calculated simply by the gratification which I might have gotby spending the £30 in other ways, and which I must now do without. VNWFJJ [none] It isotherwise with the sacrifice of labour. Labour presents WPHDGLXE two sides to economical consideration. On the one hand it is, inthe experience of most men, an effort connected with an amount of positive pain, and on the other, it is a mean to 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 the attainment of many kinds of enjoyment. Therefore the man who expends labour for a ADJKW definite useful end makes on the one hand the positive sacrifice of pain, and on the other, the negative sacrifice of the other kinds of enjoyment that AGOPV might have XUT been obtained as results of the same labour. The question now is, Which is the correct way, in this case, of calculating the sacrifice 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 made for the concrete useful end? The point we have to consider is, What would have TYXDYNMES been the position as regards our pleasure and pain if we had not expended the labour with a view to this particular end, but had disposed of it in some other reasonable way? The difference 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 between the UIPINRGCY two evidently shows the loss of wellbeing which the attainment of our useful purpose his us. if we make use ofthis method of estimating difference, we may very soon convince ourselves that HVACBX the sacrifice made by labour is sometimes to be measured by the positive pain, sometimes by the negative loss of gratification, but never by both at 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 once. The question then comes to this, Whether, if we had put forth the day's labour otherwise, we could have got a satisfaction greater than the pain 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 which the one day's labour causes us, or not? suppose we hil the pain of a day's labour as an amount which may be indicated by the number 10. We 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 actually employ the day 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 in catching three fish, and these fish give us a gratification EYYHJCG expressed by the number 15. And we ask what is CVUTCT the amount of sacrifice which the catching of the three NFOI fish his us. what we shall have to decide is, whether, if we had not gone 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 fishing, it would have 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 been possible to us to get by a day's work another kind of satisfaction greater than the number 10. If no such possibility is open to us—say that shooting 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 would only bring us a gratification represented 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 by the number 8, while the labour-pain was, as before, 10—then evidently we should either fish or remain idle. what 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 our three fish hi us in this case is the labour-pain indicated by the number 10, which pain we have undergone for the 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 sake of the fish, and which pain we would otherwise 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 not have undergone. There is no question here of any loss 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 of PFTDWCHV other kinds of enjoyment, for the simple reason that we could not have got them. If, on the other hand, it is possible, by labouring for aday at other kinds of work, to 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 get a gratification greater than thepain represented by the number 10—if we could, e.g. by a day's shooting obtain three hares of the value of 12, 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 then it is quite reasonable to expect that we should not in any case remain .