Come... to Mexico.

Can't look at our news-letter at all? Make sure to browse this to reload'em.

Come... to Mexico.

without. He may calculate thus: If I had spent to-day in shooting instead of fishing I might have shot three hares, and I must now do without the VWYKIHW gratification obtainable from TLQEDNIH these. I believe that this way of reckoning sacrifice is not incorrect. Here the man simply looks at work as a means to an end, and taking no notice of the mean—the primary sacrifice of work—fixes his attention on the end which was LKBC sacrificed through the mean. It is a method of calculation very common in economic life. Say that I have definitely set aside £30 for expenditure, but am hesitating between two modes of OTNNKVT spending it. FVSPHOM In the end I make up my mind to spend it on a pleasure trip instead of the purchase of a Persian carpet. evidently the real sacrifice which the pleasure trip 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 will hi me may be representedunder the form of the Persian carpet which I have to do without. [none] In any case it appears to HCXQY RCPXFGme obvious that, in reckoning the 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 sacrifice made for any economic end, the direct sacrifice in means—that sacrifice which is first made—and the indirect sacrifice, which takes 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 the shape of other kinds of advantage that might have been obtained in other circumstances by 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 the means sacrificed, can be calculated only alternatively and never cumulatively. I may consider the sacrifice ofmy pleasure trip to be either the £30 which it has 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 directlyhi me, or the persian carpet which it has indirectly hi me, but never as the £30 and the carpet. just in the same way our rustic may consider, as the sacrifice which the catching of the 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 three fish his him, either the day's work directly expended, or the three hares indirectly sacrificed (or, say, the gratification he gets from eating IOTTSX them), but never the day's work and the gratification obtained through 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 shooting the hares. So much I think is clear. But besides these occupations, which 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 recompense him for his day's work at the end of the day, there are others open to our labourer which produce a result that cannot be KMNXYJREH enjoyed till a later date. He might, e.g. sow wheat, getting the produce of it after a year's time; or MWOEJXGJ he might plant fruit trees, from which he could have no return for ten years. Suppose he chooses the latter. If we again leave out of account the land and the OHETAEYG trifling NQCJ wear and tear of tools, what has he sacrificed to obtain the fruit trees? To me there seems no doubt about the answer. He has sacrificed a day's work, and nothing more. Or, if the indirect way of computation be LATXNTX preferred, instead of the day's work he may calculate the other kinds of gratification that might have YOEGBBUHN been got by spending the day in other ways—say the immediate 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 enjoyment of three fish, TPWKXDEX or of three hares, or of a basket of fruit. But at all events it seems to me obvious in this case also, that, if the gratification which might have been got through 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 the work is reckoned as sacrifice, then not the smallest portion of the work itself can be reckoned in the sacrifice; while,if the work is reckoned as sacrifice, there cannot be 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 addedto that in the calculation the smallest fragment of the other kinds of 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 enjoyment that were renounced. To do otherwise would be IGGXYIHK to make a double reckoning, which would be just as false .