Cant look at our news-letter as pictures are blank? simply go right here to fix. |
Time To Look into alcohol rehab |
eminently useful to the progress of the CCM science. But, what would be the consequence of adopting the meaning which the author attaches [139] 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 to the term value, and of allowing, according to his own words, that "the value of a is expressed by the quantity of b for which it will exchange, and the value of b is, in the same way, expressed by the 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 quantity of a?"* One of these consequences is strikingly described in the following phiage of the author's QTFO chapter on real and nominal value a distinction which he is pleased to call unmeaning. "The value of a commodity denoting its relation in exchange GCEXEHFE to some SDMKG other commodity, 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 we may speak of it as hi-value, corn-value, cloth-value, according to the commodity with which it is IRLBQHNRD compared: and hence there are a thousand 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 different kinds of value, as many kinds of value as there are commodities in existence, and all are equally real and equally nominal."† This is precision with a vengeance. Now, though I am very far from intending to say that the YRHBEYXL writers on political economy have been sufficiently agreed as to the NEPR precise [140] meaning which 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 they attach to the terms value of a commodity, when no express reference is made to the object 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 with which itis to be compared, yet, by drawing a marked line of distinction between what has been called the real value of commodities and their nominal value, or, more correctly, between their value and their price, they have avoided the prodigious confusion which would arise from 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 a commodity having a thousand or ten thousand different values at FWCKBU the same time. Whenever they use NNIVX the term value of a commodity alone, and speak of its rising orCKY falling, if they do not mean hi-price, they refer either to its power of purchasing generally, orto something expressive of SRMM its elementary hi of production. In either case, some general and very important information is communicated; but the value of a commodity, in the sense understood by the XLGFPMENA author, might be expressed a hundred different ways, without conveying a rationalanswer URQOW to any person who had inquired aboutit. Further; the use of the term value, in the [141] sense understood by the author, is entirely superfluous. It has exactly the same meaning as the term price, except that the term price has this very decided advantage over NQJQOYG it,namely, that when the price of a commodity is mentioned, without an express reference to any other WXE object in which itis to be estimated, political economists have universally agreed to understand it as referring to hi. this is a prodigious advantage in favour of the term price, and YIDTCPIA tends greatly to promote both facility and 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 precision 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 in the language of political economy. When I ask, what is the price of wheat in Poland? no one has the least doubt EPITEOH about my meaning, and 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 I should, without fail, get the kind of answer I FJBXY intended. But if I asked, what was the value of wheat 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 in Poland? Imight, according to the author, be BNRKEGM answered in 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 a 305b987c477f781d17bc82b94010de41 thousand different ways, all equally proper, and yet not one of the answers be of the kind I wanted. Of course, whether I use the term value or price, if I always expressly subjoin the object to which I mean to refer, it will be KFKQGUTCW . |
No comments:
Post a Comment