Blog Archive

Friday, April 9, 2010

Re: 本土社團給我的感覺 ( 回覆 Jim)

http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/dd2200541/13105743.html

Subject:本土社團給我的感覺(回覆Jim)

 

Dear Mr. Jim,

 

北美洲台灣人教授協會(NATPA)應該與台灣人教授協會有關吧?

 

台灣人教授協會給我的印象非常差,觀其舉動,它長期擔任民進黨的軍師,及當民進黨執政,這群人馬上「麻雀變鳳凰」飛上枝頭,搖身一變成為中華民國「狗官」,因此它給我的感覺是政客幕後的操盤手,以及玩弄政治的編劇高手。

 

台灣人教授協會給我的印象非常差,觀其舉動,它長期擔任民進黨的軍師,因此給我的感覺是政客幕後的操盤手,以及玩弄政治的高手。

台灣人教授協會的某些成員,每月至少可領十幾萬元以上,來自中華民國軍公教退休18%的的福利退休俸,要它們拋棄現成的既得利益,去從事政治活動,其動機令人匪夷所思。

難怪中國會以「年薪百萬,不用開會,只提報告」去利誘台灣學者,要它們提出台灣動向情報,甚至雙薪聘請這些教授們至中國任教,美其名為聘請,實則乃施予「如何蒐集台灣情報,與如何向台灣人洗腦」的教育訓練,俗稱「台奸」。

 

也由於中國抓住台灣人太崇拜知識份子的心理,且容易相信它們「鼓勵台灣人踴躍投票給民進黨,表示民進黨執政就代表台灣是個主權獨立國家」的鬼話,台灣人完全不知道自己已漸漸掉入中國陷阱,乃至造成國際以為台灣人很樂意當中國人的嚴重錯覺,更鞏固中國併吞台灣的決心,我分析得一點都沒錯吧?

 

回覆Jim

 

1. We in the class of "Oldies" and at least born before 1945 in Formosa should know we were born Japanese.

 

:照你意思,出生在1945 年以後的台灣人,都叫中國人囉?我祖父母是出生在清朝時期的台灣人,那麼該稱為清朝人囉?

按照你的邏輯來看,我的家族裡頭就有荷蘭人(第一代祖先)、明朝人(第二代祖先)、清朝人(祖父母)、日本人(父母)、中國人等,到底要以何國人為主?你不覺得很傷腦筋嗎?

 

2. FAPA of the ROC followers cling onto desperately.

 

:在民進黨執政時期,FAPA領取來自中華民國的補助金,每年美金43萬元,它當然得扮演反派角色,目的在拉高中華民國的投票率,意即「政治酬庸」,這些早就見怪不怪了,FAPA是「向錢看」,哪像某團體不明究理,硬要拉攏FAPA,即使說破了嘴,FAPA還是不會改變「向錢看」的一本初衷。

 

其實「五十步笑百步,龜笑鱉無尾」,某團體也好不到哪裡去,弄個甚麼「台灣碗羹政府」喧聲奪人,三不五時就到AIT前「作秀」,想取得美國信賴?美國早就表示,要它拿出支持證據,但我想某團體意圖應該是「醉翁之意不在酒」,據聞它的風評很差,聽說李登輝先生被敲了500萬政治獻金,所以它也是跟FAPA半斤八兩,講難聽一點,都可以歸類到「政治詐財集團」系列榜單。

 

總歸一句話,政治利益的牽扯,製造了無數的商機與「抓耙仔」的工作,只要台灣不建國,好處就永遠跟隨這群「政治蟑螂」,而台灣也永遠被中國所掌控。

 

3. Well, Formosan staying Formosa Island has nothing wrong about, has it?

 

:不管台灣歷史如何,乃至使用甚麼名稱等等,在台灣尚未建國以前,我實在不想花時間在這問題上打轉,舊金山和約既然提到台灣,對國際而言,隨時都得以台灣作為稱呼,我實在不想再節外生枝,造成國際困擾,除非台灣已成為一個新的國家,那麼再另外取一個新的名字取代,那才有意義,而不是學某社團取不實際的「台灣國」名稱,到處招搖撞騙。

 

不過話又說回來,中華民國一向以「控制」作為鞏固政權的手段,在中華民國體制內,竟然會跑出「台灣國」社團,不但中華民國政府不加以遏阻,且准許它舉辦多次遊行活動,是否為「抓耙仔」?頗耐人尋味。

 

像本會作風「實話實說」就實在多了,我若太久時間沒寫信給國際,三不五時,會接到美國國務院的通知,看來它真的把本會列入為它的顧問團隊,不過我的直覺告訴我,它主要還是想知道我是否平安,請AIT 代我向美國國務院致崇高敬意。

 

坦白說,本會根本不會去玩那些「擾民傷財,撈財騙票」的政治把戲,製造美國的困擾,真正想做事的人,不需要靠募款,除了228大屠殺與國民黨戒嚴的白色恐怖等,與我周遭親人有關的台灣近代史以外,我是不會花太多腦筋去探討其他需要考證的台灣歷史,還是留給考古學家一口飯吃吧!

 

台灣住民個人前途自決會http://vote911.net/bbs/
http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/dd2200541
凃桂英敬啟



2010/4/9, Jim Cheng 撰寫:
Dear Ms. 凃桂英 <vote911.net@gmail.com>
 
I sent the attached below to the NATPA this morning and send
it again to you. Hope you like it and probably you will
understand the Formosan History some of us learned from
history records at large available in the world.
 
I would also like to tell you (partially to pick one of your bones)
on an earlier posting. "Want to be Japanese, then go to Japan
to live." Perhaps. we in the class of "Oldies" and at least born before 1945 in Formosa should know we were born Japanese
whether we like it or not.
 
I have a senior friend who published his autobiography that he
deserves to have one from his well regarded reputation in the
world. He learned his ancenstor came to Formosa nearly 200-
year ago. But he wrote that he attended "Taihoku" First High
and his home was in "Taihoku" at the time. Taihoku as you
know is called Taipei today and PRC preceeded with the China
to abolish Taiwan and alter it to replace "Taiwan" that DPP,
FAPA of the ROC followers cling onto desperately.
 
Taihoku since it was called as such when he attended and
printed as such. Do we have to be chauvinistic to use an
 alternative since it is used by Chinese mafia.
 
Well, Formosan staying Formosa Island has nothing wrong
about, has it?    Jim Cheng. 100408
 
"Misconceived 'Taiwan' History Initially I was writing on officially called names of our island in detail but I am letting it sleep for a while and, instead, write a new abbreviated version for posting. It started with the name by the indigenes in southern island both of which have been documented by the Dutch and Japanese available for the public. Then came the now widely and freely talked about "Ilha Formosa" legend by Portuguese sailors that led the Portuguese to call the Island Formosa and placed her on the world map for the first time in the world history. All happened before the mid of 1500 (i.e., mid 16th century).

 

Does , being a "historian" know this history? Should young people argue for "Li" or "Lee" or putting a big hat as "to deny " 's DVD version of "Taiwan History" denying "228 massacre" in the hand of heinous Chiang KS and Chinese-authority Mafia? In Greek mythology, all Zeus' siblings "Giants" with big "??" were either subdued or expelled by his almighty Scepter? It is a mythology but a mythology is a mere fantasy tale? What is the meaning of "Power of Myth" by the greatest story-teller Joseph Campbell that America ever produced?

 

The most powerful Japanese warlord, Shogun Toyotomi Hedeyosi at one period twice sent official delegates successively in 1593 demanding "the king" of the island to pay the offering in exchange for the territorial protection under Japan. The delegate documents were addressed to the island first as "Takasago" and second, "Takayama" (High Mountain). When 陳第 landed the island by following the Chinese "navy" general in 1602 (17th century) and then submitted the official report to the then Ming Emperor in 1603, the document stated only by the name "Eastern Barbarian island," which is the common Chinese practice to call when an island had not been called with a special name.

 

After the Dutch landed on the island in 1623, they made the name Formosa official and so declared to the world in 1624. The name is historically appropriately called and also had been the only name known worldwide. Thus, I strictly use Formosa and Formosan.

 

When Koxinga occupied the island in 1662, he (survived only one year thereafter) and his successor named our island Tong-tu first and Tong-ning next. After Manchurian Ch'in replaced Koxinga, Ch'in started to use "Taiwan" sometimes after 1683.

 

As to all other Chinese names allegedly appeared in different "China history documents" insisted by pro-China historians (some may not be a "pro—per se") came from dubious origins at best since these alleged documents are always either lost or irretrievable. All names have a phonetic similarity most likely derived initially from Tayouan (in Dutch way of spelling based on sound the indigene calling around the Zeelandia Castle area and clearly written in VOC document) or others similar to the sound.

 

Jim Cheng. 100408"


 

No comments: