I think the decision will have no impact on people's right to privacy, because I don't regard truthful ination in court records published by court in a newspaper to be private ination. If anything, the decision is likely to simply muddle the interesting philosophical questions and it more difficult to real progress on privacy issues. In the case of truthful, non-defamatory ination obtained ly, I think t is no possibility of any defensible "right" to censor what other people are saying. It is important to language like "data" because we aren't talking about "data"—we are talking about the suppression of kledge. Wales then provided further explanation, drag a comparison with Wikipedia: "You do not have a right to use the law to prevent Wikipedia editors from writing truthful ination, nor do you have a right to use the law to prevent Google from publishing truthful ination." Wales concluded with an indication of his i outcome: "A part of the outcome should be the very strong implementation of a right to speech in Europe—essentially the language of the First Amendment in the U.S." Other issues Wales at the 2018 World Economic Forum in Davos In 2012, the Secretary of the U.K. was petitioned by Wales in regard to his opposition to the extrition of Richard O'Dwyer to the U.S. After an agreement was reached to the extrition, Wales commented, "This is very exciting news, and I'm pleased to hear it ... What needs to happen next is a serious reconsideration of the UK extrition treaty that would allow this sort of nonsense in the first place." In August 2013, Wales criticized U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron's plan for an Internet porn-filter, saying that the idea was "ridiculous." In November 2013, Wales also commented on the Sden affair, describing Edward Sden as "a hero" whom history would judge "very favourably;" ditionally, Wales said the U.S. public "would have approved sweeping surveillance program [publicized by Sden]," h they been ined or asked about it. During the Gamergate controversy in 2014, in response to an email from a computer science student, Wales allegedly said of the Gamergate movement that "It is very difficult for me to into the notion that gamergate is 'really about ethics in journalism' when every single experience I have personally h with it involved pro-gg people insulting, threatening, doxxing, etc." and that the movement "has been permanently tarnished and highjacked by a handful of people who are not what you would hope."
|
No comments:
Post a Comment