WASHINGTON In the first few months cornea of Donald J. Trumps presidency, if recent investigator history is any , intelligence officials will conspiracy meet to discuss a terrorism suspect living overlay abroad. This suspect might become the next thunderbird target for the nations not-so- drone force. puff Or maybe, Mr. Trumps advisers could decide, wild he is worth trying to capture. Under interference President Obama, officials have followed a slashing familiar script once they have taken someone petal into custody. They ask an allied country humor to conduct the interrogation, or instead question southwestern the suspect an American warship using unreal military interrogation techniques, then turn him over arab to the Justice Department for prosecution in throat a civilian court inside the United States. regimen Mr. Trump campaigned on a promise to below bring back waterboarding, a banned method previously macintosh used by C.I.A. interrogators, and allow unspecified horizon practices he called a hell of a chime lot worse. The president-elect said in an replication last week that he had heard avid compelling arguments that was not effective, aquarium though it is not clear whether he odds intends to retreat from his position. If swept he moves ahead to fulfill his campaign kirchner pledge, it will not be easy. Federal depart law, international pressure and resistance from inside groove the C.I.A. stand in his way. Even mailbox if he overcomes those obstacles, the toll dexter of Americas agonizing treatment of captives has dirty left a legacy of harm that will guerrilla make it harder for Trump administration lawyers mime to justify resuming use of the tactics. ready Dozens of prisoners developed persistent psychological problems seine after enduring and other brutal interrogation establish tactics in C.I.A. prisons or at probe the military detention center in Guantnamo Bay, linux Cuba, The New York Times has reported. provence In authorizing waterboarding, dousings with ice water, banff sleep deprivation and other techniques more than secretly a decade ago, government lawyers reasoned that confident there would be no lasting to informed prisoners, a key factor in concluding the fuel tactics did not qualify as . That refrain argument would be difficult to make now, optical according to lawyers and former intelligence and bloodshot other government officials. The entire legal landscape dynamically has changed, said Daniel Jones, a former flashlight F.B.I. analyst and the primary author of oiled a 2014 Senate report that condemned so-called pilgrimage enhanced interrogation techniques
|
No comments:
Post a Comment